In this post, I want to discuss the CoL Hypothesis/Agreement and how this fits with Tamaki and Manaiakalani Data and in forming a related Inquiry.
CoL Hypothesis/Agreement
CoL Hypothesis/Agreement
Getting in behind the problem
Language acquisition, development, sustaining & transferLearning Design including
- Formative practice
- Progressional understanding
- Effective planning for learning
Focusing on Language acquisition, development, sustaining and transfer will hopefully give us the biggest bang of our buck not only in raising student achievement in writing in the Junior years but across the curriculum. Not only this but it creates wonderings of the effects this will have on students achievement as they progress through their schooling, building on the foundations that have been acquired early on.
Welcome To School: A Study of Conditions of Disadvantage on Entry to School in the Manaiakalani Kahui Ako (2017) shows
This is evident in our Junior classrooms as students struggle to communicate their ideas. Students use silence, one, two word utterances, gestures, lack understanding of plurals and prepositions and understanding of syntax and semantics. Sentences are often short and tangled and consist of simple vocabulary.
When trying to verbalise your ideas is difficult, writing can then be even harder.
For me, addressing Achievement Challenge 2: Lifting the achievement for boys' writing Years 1-10, and getting in behind the problem at a Junior Level means focusing my teaching practice intensively on oral language acquisition. If we can raise achievement in this area, transference into writing will not only be seen but also transference across the curriculum where communication is equally important.
Hi Jo, Valuable connections with the findings from the Welcome to School study. This prompted me to add the report to our shared folder, thanks.
ReplyDeleteWhat approaches have you used to get a more detailed and accurate profile of your students’ learning in relation to this challenge? This may be your next post I suspect 😉.
There are possible actions shared on our TaI framework you will find useful too.
thanks again,Fiona
Thanks Fiona,
ReplyDeleteThe Tal Framework is great, really focuses the inquiry process. Thinking about Scanning... I am going to gather student voice to find out what is going on for our learners End of Term 1 then again End of Term 3. Also Whanau voice would be valuable qualitative data. My team is also assessing the student's oral language using the Combilist from Jannie Van Hees. This put together should dig deeper and give my Team a more detailed profile of our students.